Frame
Start with the planning question
Clarify which belonging and culture decisions the analysis should help stakeholders discuss.
Case study · Education data + public systems
At DCPS, I worked with Panorama survey data and the people planning school culture programs. My role connected analysis with Culture Institute support and student-adult leadership.
01 · The question
District survey data can surface patterns that individual anecdotes cannot, but the numbers still need context. The work connected Panorama survey analysis with conversations about culture, equity, student voice, and how adults and students share responsibility for school climate.
02 · My contribution and boundaries
I analyzed Panorama survey data, supported Culture Institute design and logistics, and helped develop shared student-adult leadership structures with the district team.
03 · Evidence flow
Enlarge image
04 · Working approach
A survey number only becomes useful once someone can trace it back to a real planning question, which meant working through four stages before anything reached a stakeholder.
Frame
Clarify which belonging and culture decisions the analysis should help stakeholders discuss.
Analyze
Review survey results for themes and differences that warrant closer contextual interpretation.
Interpret
Use student voice and human-centered thinking to keep meaning attached to the metrics.
Support
Help make the evidence usable in Culture Institute and shared-leadership conversations.
05 · Contribution
Reading the data well was half the job; the other half was making sure it reached people in a form they could actually use.
Used survey evidence to surface belonging themes relevant to district planning.
Translated analysis into language that could support conversation outside an analytics team.
Contributed to Culture Institute design and logistics alongside the analytical work.
Supported structures intended to strengthen collaboration between students and adults.
06 · Limits
07 · What this work shaped
I left DCPS more interested in what happens after an analysis is finished: who reads it, what they need to decide, and whether students recognize their own experiences in the conversation.