Now / Spring 2026

Current rhythm, current signal.

Right now I am building around a simple cadence: protected maker time, Cornell track discipline, student opportunity systems through MOCA, and professional momentum through Accenture and EY Beyond the Game.

Cadence

How spring 2026 is organized

Maker time

Focused build blocks

Protecting time for portfolio polish, data storytelling, policy writing, and systems projects that make my strongest proof easier to inspect.

Track schedule

Training, travel, and execution

Competing with Cornell Track & Field while balancing coursework and leadership. The routine keeps the standard high and the margin for drift low.

Campus systems

MOCA programming

Building speaker series, alumni outreach, and professional development infrastructure that expands access for men of color in athletics.

Policy momentum

Education access lens

Continuing to connect DC public school experience, education research, and policy writing into clearer arguments about access and implementation.

Professional Momentum

What is becoming more legible

The 2026 signal is stronger because it is not only one thing. Accenture points toward consulting and strategy. EY Beyond the Game recognizes leadership shaped by athletics. MOCA and DC education research keep the work rooted in access, community, and public systems.

Consulting Strategy Education policy Athlete leadership

Recruiter Read

What to open first

For consulting or strategy

Start with the resume library, Accenture/EY recognition, and selected work that shows structured problem solving.

For public sector or education roles

Start with DCPS, DC Education Research Collaborative, and the policy page.

For product, data, or systems roles

Start with Smart Hive, DC Arrest Trends, and the portfolio information architecture itself.

Through-line

Why these pieces connect

DC public schools taught me to notice access. Cornell athletics taught me repetition, standards, and pressure. Policy and data work gave me tools for naming what is happening inside systems. Together, they point toward the same kind of work: making complex institutions clearer, fairer, and more usable.