ADU Policy Paper (Housing, New Avery)

Problem

Housing shortages persist while many residential lots are underutilized. Zoning and permitting rules often block small-scale additions that could increase supply without major neighborhood disruption.

Context

• Political tension: housing need vs. neighborhood concerns (parking, density, character).
• Administrative friction: complex approvals can make ADUs too expensive or slow to build.
• Equity: without design, benefits can skew toward higher-income homeowners with capital access.

Analysis

• ADUs are a “small wins” lever: they won’t solve supply alone but can meaningfully expand options over time.
• Rules shape participation: setbacks, owner-occupancy, and parking requirements heavily influence adoption.
• Cost is the constraint: financing access and permitting speed are often bigger blockers than demand.
• Implementation matters: cities need clear guides, predictable timelines, and support for compliant builds.

Recommendation

• Simplify and standardize permitting (clear checklist + predictable timeline).
• Reduce barriers where possible (review parking rules, streamline design constraints).
• Pair reform with equity supports (technical assistance, financing options, fee transparency).
• Track outcomes (permits issued, build completion, affordability, and neighborhood impacts).

Why it matters

ADU policy is a practical test of whether housing reform can be both pro-supply and equity-aware. Good implementation increases options, supports multigenerational living, and reduces pressure on rents over time.